To read this content please select one of the options below:

The role and status of qualitative methods in management research: an empirical account

Catherine Cassell (Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK)
Gillian Symon (Department of Organizational Psychology, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK)
Anna Buehring (Business School, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK)
Phil Johnson (Management School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK)

Management Decision

ISSN: 0025-1747

Article publication date: 1 February 2006

10514

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to present a piece of empirical work that investigates the current role and status of qualitative research within the management field.

Design/methodology/approach

The research is based on 45 in‐depth qualitative interviews with members of a range of different stakeholder groups, including: journal editors; qualitative researchers; Doctoral Programme Leaders; practitioners; and those who fund qualitative management research.

Findings

The findings suggest that there is considerable variety in definitions of qualitative research; that there are still a number of issues surrounding the status and credibility of qualitative research within the field; and there is a need for greater access to researcher training in this area.

Practical implications

The paper is of practical interest to qualitative researchers in that it details some of the issues surrounding publishing qualitative work.

Originality/value

The paper presents original empirical work in this field.

Keywords

Citation

Cassell, C., Symon, G., Buehring, A. and Johnson, P. (2006), "The role and status of qualitative methods in management research: an empirical account", Management Decision, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 290-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740610650256

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles