To read this content please select one of the options below:

The process of subsidiary strategy: a study of Ciba‐Geigy Classical Pigments

James H. Taggart (Strathclyde International Business Unit, Department of Marketing, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK)
Mark S. Harding (Strathclyde International Business Unit, Department of Marketing, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK)

Management Decision

ISSN: 0025-1747

Article publication date: 1 November 1998

3100

Abstract

This paper analyses the strategy of Ciba‐Geigy′s industrial division at three hierarchical levels, concentrating on subsidiary strategy in the Classical Pigments business. The analysis makes use of a number of models: the BCG matrix, White and Poynter′s model of subsidiary strategy, Porter′s configuration‐co‐ordination paradigm, and Prahalad and Doz’s integration‐responsiveness framework. The strengths and weaknesses of each are evaluated within this particular industrial environment. The main conclusion of the paper is that use of these four alternative analytical perspectives yields a more holistic view of strategy in the Classical Pigments business.

Keywords

Citation

Taggart, J.H. and Harding, M.S. (1998), "The process of subsidiary strategy: a study of Ciba‐Geigy Classical Pigments", Management Decision, Vol. 36 No. 9, pp. 568-579. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810239450

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1998, MCB UP Limited

Related articles