More on the Chicago tradition

Abstract

Offers a response to David Laidler’s article “More on Hawtrey, Harvard and Chicago”, in this issue. Asserts that the unique Chicagoan quantity‐theory of the early 1930s embodied a policy framework which left it immune from the Keynesian revolution and contained important linkages with Friedman’s views in its business‐cycle analysis and policy positions. Claims that this tradition explains why Chicago (and not Harvard) originated the monetarist counter‐revolution.

Citation

Tavlas, G.S. (1998), "More on the Chicago tradition", Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443589810368163