To read this content please select one of the options below:

A proactive assessment of sick building syndrome

Linda Thomas‐Mobley (Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA)
Kathy O. Roper (Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA)
Rita Oberle (Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA)

Facilities

ISSN: 0263-2772

Article publication date: 1 January 2005

1667

Abstract

Purpose

This paper describes a new proactive approach for facility managers to assess and manage complaints of “sick buildings”.

Design/methodology/approach

The assessment of the “sick building” syndrome problem is multifaceted and should include both objective data such as those collected and analyzed by industrial hygienists, and subjective data such as occupant perception measurements, usually gathered by surveys. The data for this research, both objective and subjective, were provided on a wide variety of office buildings and were analyzed using an artificial neural‐network based model.

Findings

Current literature on the subject suggests that the cause of poor indoor environments involves many variables interacting in an unlimited number of combinations. Using a blended definition of a narrowly defined “sick building”, a framework for a decision‐making support system for facility managers is provided.

Research limitations/implications

The data collection was limited to Southeastern US commercial office buildings, but the model has global applicability.

Practical implications

Recommendations are presented to help facility managers better understand the complex nature of the indoor environment based on this research.

Originality/value

This research and data analysis can be tailored to and is applicable to any building type.

Keywords

Citation

Thomas‐Mobley, L., Roper, K.O. and Oberle, R. (2005), "A proactive assessment of sick building syndrome", Facilities, Vol. 23 No. 1/2, pp. 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770510575866

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles