To read this content please select one of the options below:

One company – two outcomes: Knowledge integration vs corporate disintegration in the absence of knowledge management

William P. Hall (Engineering Learning Unit, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia)
Susu Nousala (Spatial Information Architecture Lab (SIAL), School of Architecture and Design, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia)
Bill Kilpatrick (Melbourne School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia)

VINE

ISSN: 0305-5728

Article publication date: 28 August 2009

914

Abstract

Purpose

To learn to avoid pitfalls there is need to accept and understand failures. This anonymous case study aims to report a major organisational failure due to the absence of effective knowledge management, where both the reasons for, and organisational consequences of, the failure are fairly clear.

Design/methodology/approach

Within a theoretical framework of organisational autopoiesis, the case study compares knowledge management styles from two eras in the history of one engineering project management company: as it grew from an acquired site with a single project to a multi‐divisional leader in its regional market, and then as it failed in its original line of business to the point where it divested most of its assets.

Findings

In the first era, the executive and line managers were permissive, allowing project teams to work out local solutions for business problems as they arose producing successful and profitable solutions. The decline began and accelerated when management strengthened hierarchical command and control that stifled knowledge sharing and solution development at the work face and exceeded line managers' limits of rationality.

Research limitations/implications

This study has the limitations of any historical study of a single case, exacerbated by a need to maintain the anonymity of the surviving company.

Originality/value

Few studies so clearly highlight the critical importance of personal knowledge and its sharing in knowledge intensive organisations for maintaining successful operations. Success may have many parents, but in this case the internal comparisons identify specific factors that caused a successful organisation to disintegrate.

Keywords

Citation

Hall, W.P., Nousala, S. and Kilpatrick, B. (2009), "One company – two outcomes: Knowledge integration vs corporate disintegration in the absence of knowledge management", VINE, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 242-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055720911003996

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles