To read this content please select one of the options below:

Process improvement through marketing variance analysis

Mary Margaret Weber (Assistant Professor of Marketing at Emporia State University)
James L. Dodd (Assistant Professor ofAccounting at Drake University, USA)
Robert E. Wood (Associate Professor of Information Systems at Drake University, USA)
Harry I. Wolk ( Professor ofAccounting at Drake University, USA)

Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing

ISSN: 0885-8624

Article publication date: 1 April 1997

1857

Abstract

In the 1970s and early 1980s several studies recommended using a framework based on a 1977 Hulbert and Toy model for analyzing marketing variances. Proposes adaptation of the model to control the processes of sales planning and sales performance, not the performance of individuals as originally advocated ten to 15 years ago. Emphasizes process improvement, rather than people measurement, consistent with the current quality movement that so many firms have embraced. Implementation of the Hulbert and Toy model requires generation of a revised plan. By comparing the original plan, the revised plan, and actual results, management can identify where improvements in the planning processes may be achieved. The objective is to reduce variation between actual and planned sales. Suggests that reduced planning variances yield a higher quality plan and a more harmonious operation.

Keywords

Citation

Margaret Weber, M., Dodd, J.L., Wood, R.E. and Wolk, H.I. (1997), "Process improvement through marketing variance analysis", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858629710172646

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1997, MCB UP Limited

Related articles