Three phantom budget cuts and how to avoid them

Abstract

Purpose

This paper explains how library budgets can be cut in ways that are quick and unexpected. The purpose of this paper is to provide reasoning for these cuts with strategies for mediation and avoidance.

Design/methodology/approach

By understanding the intricacies of three unique types of phantom cuts, library managers can keep their budgets secure and even win additional monies moving forward.

Findings

Budgets can be cut through sound library fiscal management, large‐scale restructuring, or swift reaction to unexpected losses in revenue. Keeping the philosophy of the library as the best centerpiece for the potential for learning is the proper method to retain funding.

Originality/value

This paper shows sound fiscal management as a potential danger to managerial rewards for sound judgement, and introduces the reader to various aspects of zero‐based budgeting and strategic moves for handling complex fiscal change.

Citation

Cottrell, T.(T). (2012), "Three phantom budget cuts and how to avoid them", The Bottom Line, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 16-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/08880451211229171