To read this content please select one of the options below:

International comparisons of patients’ views on quality of care

Bodil Wilde Larsson (Division for Health and Care, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden)
Gerry Larsson (Department of Leadership and Management, Swedish National Defence College, Karlstad, Sweden)
Marie Wickman Chantereau (Capio, Gothenburg, Sweden)
Karin Staël von Holstein (Capio, Gothenburg, Sweden)

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

ISSN: 0952-6862

Article publication date: 1 January 2005

1468

Abstract

Purpose

To compare patients’ views on quality of care in different countries using a theory‐based instrument, while at the same time controlling for the following potential confounders: type of care system (private vs public), type of care (kind of health problem), gender, age, and subjective wellbeing.

Design/methodology/approach

Patients capable of communicating in wards (medical and surgical departments) and day surgery departments in England, France, Norway, and Sweden were recruited consecutively, to participate in a programme run by the health‐care company Capio. Ward patients: England (n =1,236), France (n =1,051), Norway (n =226), and Sweden (n =428). Day surgery patients: England (n =887), France (n =544), Norway (n =101), and Sweden (n =742). Average response rate across settings: approximately 75 per cent. Patients evaluated the quality of the care they actually received and the subjective importance they ascribed to different aspects of care. The questionnaire “Quality from the patient's perspective” (QPP) was used (modified short version).

Findings

Cross‐national comparisons were made within each of the two care contexts (wards and day surgery) separately for men and women. Quality of care evaluations were adjusted for age and subjective wellbeing. English and French patients scored significantly higher than Norwegian and Swedish on both kinds of ratings (perceived reality and subjective importance), in both kinds of care contexts, and in both sexes.

Originality/value

Cross‐national comparisons of patients’ views on care can give meaningful guidance for practitioners only if they are context‐specific and if well‐known confounders are controlled for.

Keywords

Citation

Wilde Larsson, B., Larsson, G., Wickman Chantereau, M. and Staël von Holstein, K. (2005), "International comparisons of patients’ views on quality of care", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860510576974

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles