To read this content please select one of the options below:

Quality of care and patient satisfaction in budget‐holding clinics

Revital Gross (Senior Researcher at JDC‐Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem, Israel)
Nurit Nirel (Researcher at JDC‐Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem, Israel)

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

ISSN: 0952-6862

Article publication date: 1 June 1998

1119

Abstract

A budget‐holding program was implemented in nine primary care clinics in the Negev district of Kupat Holim Clinic, Israel’s largest sick fund. This study, carried out from 1991 to 1994, evaluates the impact of this program on patient satisfaction and other selected indicators of quality of care, using a controlled case study methodology. Structured questionnaires were used in face‐to‐face interviews with a representative stratified sample of 523 patients registered in the clinics. Patient reports were used to measure patient satisfaction, accessibility of services, comprehensiveness of care, responsiveness to patients’ needs and performance of preventive medicine activities. Other research tools included staff surveys, in‐depth interviews and administrative data on transfer among sick funds. The findings counter fears that budgetary control and cost‐containment negatively affect quality of care and patient satisfaction. However, the program did not fulfill expectations regarding improvement in clinic services and patient satisfaction.

Keywords

Citation

Gross, R. and Nirel, N. (1998), "Quality of care and patient satisfaction in budget‐holding clinics", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526869810213000

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1998, MCB UP Limited

Related articles