Emergency psychiatric assessments: do outcomes match priorities?

Abstract

The targeting of scarce mental health resources is currently organised around three broad areas: treating severe mental illness; reducing suicide; and obviating risk to the wider community. High priority clients are those who present with either psychotic symptoms, or who are perceived to be high risk to self or others. This study examined records of emergency assessments at a mental health trust in the south‐east of England over a three‐month period (n = 336) to see whether clients with these characteristics are more likely than others to be offered hospital admission or treatment. It was found that clients presenting with psychosis are much more likely to be offered admission than those assessed as non‐psychotic, that those assessed as a suicide risk are also significantly more likely to be offered admission, and that those assessed as presenting a risk to the public at large are no more likely to be admitted than those presenting no risk. This investigation indicates that the emergency service of the trust studied is addressing the first two target areas, but may be under‐performing in the third.

Citation

Green, G. (1999), "Emergency psychiatric assessments: do outcomes match priorities?", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 12 No. 7, pp. 309-313. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526869910287576