To read this content please select one of the options below:

A structurationist analysis of post‐bureaucracy in modernity and late modernity

Louise Briand (Accounting Department, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Québec, Canada)
Guy Bellemare (Industrial Relations Department, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Québec, Canada)

Journal of Organizational Change Management

ISSN: 0953-4814

Article publication date: 1 January 2006

4183

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to use case study evidence to show that post‐bureaucracy is less marked by a discontinuity in surveillance than by its displacement and intensification.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper describes the complex changes that occurred at the International Development Research Center, a Canadian public corporation.

Findings

Fundamental clash of values is evident. The reform has brought about a “new order” which relies on a centralized model of governance. Moves towards the “post‐bureaucratic organization” have entailed intensified surveillance and produced a new structure of domination.

Originality/value

The paper argues that Anthony Giddens' theories of late modernity and structuration contain elements that explain the emergence of new organizational forms, their continuity and transformation.

Keywords

Citation

Briand, L. and Bellemare, G. (2006), "A structurationist analysis of post‐bureaucracy in modernity and late modernity", Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810610643695

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles