To read this content please select one of the options below:

Middle‐level secondary school leaders: Potential, constraints and implications for leadership preparation and development

David Gurr (Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia)
Lawrie Drysdale (Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia)

Journal of Educational Administration

ISSN: 0957-8234

Article publication date: 25 January 2013

6150

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this paper is to bring together for the first time three studies of middle‐level leaders in secondary schools in Victoria, Australia. The studies span more than a decade and allow consideration of the progress in developing middle‐level leadership roles.

Design/methodology/approach

All studies followed a consistent approach using multiple perspective interviews of middle‐level curriculum and subject leadership in government and Catholic secondary schools in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Principals, senior leaders, middle‐level leaders and teachers were interviewed to gain their perceptions on middle‐level leadership. Interviews were supplemented with school document analysis.

Findings

The work of middle‐level leaders is heavily dependent on how their roles are constructed and the capacities, abilities and attitudes of the leaders. Some are expected to be leaders that influence teaching and learning, and they may be developed and supported to do so. Too often, however, teachers in these key roles have few expectations or opportunities to exercise leadership. Whilst many have the capacity to be leaders of teaching and learning, others are not sure about their ability to influence teaching and learning. Suggestions are made for how leadership might be structured in schools to emphasise the importance of middle‐level leaders, and how these leaders can be better prepared and supported.

Research limitations/implications

Observational studies, studies of primary school contexts and cross‐country comparisons would extend this research.

Practical implications

Middle‐level school leaders need to be seen as key personnel in improving teaching and learning, school structures need to reflect this, and developing leadership capacity needs to be prioritised.

Originality/value

This paper highlights continuing issues with how the work of middle‐level school leaders is conceptualised and supported, and makes suggestions for leadership structure and the preparation and development of school leaders.

Keywords

Citation

Gurr, D. and Drysdale, L. (2013), "Middle‐level secondary school leaders: Potential, constraints and implications for leadership preparation and development", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 55-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311291431

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2013, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles