Die noodsaaklikheid van rekeningkunde‐opleiding vir prokureurs: Enkele empiriese bevindings

Abstract

The amendement of the carriculum for the so‐called four‐year LLB degree that has been presented at universities since 1998 put great pressure on faculties of law at that time, because they had to reflect on the curriculum for the degree over a relatively short period. Legal Accounting was one of the courses that were probably included by most universities as optional subjects in the curriculum and no longer as a compulsory subject as the situation used to be for the BProc degree. However, the admission examination for attorneys still includes an examination paper on Legal Accounting. Therefore an increasing number of students have to sit for this examination without having attended a course in Legal Accounting. In the light of this situation, two research projects were undertaken in 1997 to determine the views of attorneys and prospective attorneys on accounting training for the two groups. As three years have passed and persons with the four‐year LLB degree are entering the legal profession, it was decided to repeat the project to determine whether the views of the two groups of respondents had changed since the previous project. In this article, the views of the practising attorneys and prospective attorneys are discussed and compared with the results of the 1997 project.

Citation

Lubbe, D.S., Raubenheimer, E. and Britz, R. (2000), "Die noodsaaklikheid van rekeningkunde‐opleiding vir prokureurs: Enkele empiriese bevindings", Meditari Accountancy Research, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1108/10222529200000006