The exit option: mediation and the termination of negotiations in the Northern Ireland conflict

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to examine the mediation exit option, which is one of the most important tactics available to any third party mediator.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper analyzes a crucial intermediary channel between the Irish Republican Army (hereafter IRA) and the British Government utilizing unique material from the private papers of the intermediary, Brendan Duddy, including diaries that cover periods of intensive communication, extensive interviews with the intermediary and with participants in this communication on both the British Government and Irish Republican sides as well as recently released official papers from the UK National Archives relating to this communication.

Findings

The study reveals how the intermediary channel was used in order to get information, how the third party and the primary parties traded in asymmetries of information, and how the intermediary utilized the information advantage to increase the credibility of his threats of termination.

Research limitations/implications

The study outlines an avenue for further research on the termination dynamics of mediation.

Practical implications

Understanding the conditions for successfully using the exit‐option is vital for policy‐makers, in particular for peace diplomacy efforts in other contexts than the Northern Ireland one.

Originality/value

The paper challenges previous explanations for why threats by mediators to call off further mediation attempts are successful and argues that a mediator can use the parties' informational dependency on him in order to increase his leverage and push the parties towards settlement.

Citation

O´ Dochartaigh, N. and Svensson, I. (2013), "The exit option: mediation and the termination of negotiations in the Northern Ireland conflict", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 40-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444061311296125