To read this content please select one of the options below:

How reliable are the recommendations of the Cruickshank Report? An assessment of market definition in UK competition analysis of retail banking markets

John K. Ashton (International Institute of Banking and Financial Services (IIBFS), Leeds University Business School, The University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS2 9JT, UK; tel: +44 (0)113 233 2618; fax: +44 (0)113 233 4459; e‐mail: ja@lubs.leeds.ac.uk)

Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance

ISSN: 1358-1988

Article publication date: 1 March 2002

523

Abstract

The paper considers two central issues; one, how was the definition of the UK banking market undertaken within the Cruickshank Report, and two, how might the assumptions made in defining banking markets have influenced the competition analysis and overall conclusions presented by the report. In this paper, the banking market for personal customers is discussed in relation to theoretical and empirical work and the distribution of banking branches in the UK. An assessment of the form of competition, used in the Cruickshank Report, builds on this discussion and considers the implications of a possible oversight in the definition of the UK banking market. Recommendations and suggestions for further work are provided within the conclusions.

Keywords

Citation

Ashton, J.K. (2002), "How reliable are the recommendations of the Cruickshank Report? An assessment of market definition in UK competition analysis of retail banking markets", Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/13581980210810085

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 2002, MCB UP Limited

Related articles