Reviewing local screening policies – a worthwhile exercise?

Abstract

Reviews antenatal and early childhood screening programmes to assess the impact of guidance from the National Screening Committee (NSC). Develops methods to investigate local practice (questionnaires and telephone interviews) and summarises best practice guidance from authoritative sources. Reviews 23 antenatal and 15 early childhood programmes, of which 22 and eight respectively are in place locally. Different types of authoritative sources varied in the aspect of screening on which they commented. Guidance from authoritative sources differed and local practice variations reflected this. In three programmes these variations needed to be addressed. Elsewhere, the NSC’s “watch and wait” stance was confirmed. Limitations to local quality assurance were also identified. Programmes are for the most part following authoritative guidance, but variations in authoritative guidance are a significant issue. Robust audit is required to ensure that the local programmes are achieving optimal health gain.

Citation

Thornton‐Jones, H., Hampshaw, S., Soltan, H. and Madhok, R. (2002), "Reviewing local screening policies – a worthwhile exercise?", British Journal of Clinical Governance, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1108/14664100210438253