Do we really want all learning to be experiential? The hot stove effect

Abstract

Purpose

To expose the errors of assuming that all experiential learning is good and to challenge naïve use of Kolb's learning cycle. The article also provides advice to organizations on how to develop people where they are not taking action on real needs.

Design/methodology/approach

The article is based on work done in a variety of organizations around how people actually learn.

Findings

People often need to overcome the errors of experiential learning.

Practical implications

The article has real practical implications for leaders/managers and learning and development professionals as it shows how to overcome the limiting effects of experiential learning. It offers a practical approach to developing people in organizations.

Originality/value

The article will be of value to managers and learning specialists as it raises important issues about how to promote effective learning in organizations.

Citation

Cunningham, I. (2007), "Do we really want all learning to be experiential? The hot stove effect", Development and Learning in Organizations, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 4-5. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777280710739043