To read this content please select one of the options below:

Systematic risk pricing and investment performance of UK and US property markets

Terry Grissom (School of Built Environment, Built Environment Research Institute, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, UK and Department of Urban Planning and Design, College of Built Environments, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA)
Lay Cheng Lim (School of Built Environment, Built Environment Research Institute, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, UK)
James DeLisle (Department of Urban Planning and Design, College of Built Environments, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA)

Journal of European Real Estate Research

ISSN: 1753-9269

Article publication date: 4 May 2012

842

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the strategy that a turnaround in the USA will portend a turnaround in the UK's economy and property market. For this strategy to operate, it is assumed that the capital and property markets in and between the two nations are highly integrated with endogenous pricing functions.

Design/methodology/approach

Given the endogenous assumptions of the conjectured research statement, tests of integration (or segmentation) between two capital and property markets are conducted. Correlation, tracking error analysis, and a multiple systematic risk factor model are used to test the pricing relationships. The methodological form employs variant macroeconomic variable pricing models (MVM) of alternative combinations of systematic affects operating across and between the national markets.

Findings

Pricing integration is noted between the UK and US capital markets, while the property markets are economically and statistically segmented. Opportunities for arbitrage based on different prices/returns for equivalent risk exposures are statistically observed between the UK and USA. The effect is that systematic pricing between the two markets cannot be addressed solely by diversification options. This infers a potential for arbitrage (statistically, strategically or in practice) is possible, given that systematic risk exposures between the two markets are not equivalently priced across cyclical phases. In this context it is inferred that the probable measure of pricing differences across the two markets is more than a cyclical lag effect.

Originality/value

The paper delineates the degrees of integration/segmentation in the UK and US property and capital markets as a function of systematic risks in changing economic conditions. These differences support the existence of statistical arbitrage and the specification of investment behaviour as a function of differencing pricing expectations. These findings can assist in the formulation of investment and hedging strategies to assist in managing international portfolios subject to cyclical market exposures. This paper contributes to an understanding of and foundation for testing the nature and impact of cycles on property investment performance as a function of pricing changes.

Keywords

Citation

Grissom, T., Cheng Lim, L. and DeLisle, J. (2012), "Systematic risk pricing and investment performance of UK and US property markets", Journal of European Real Estate Research, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 66-87. https://doi.org/10.1108/17539261211216012

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles