Index

Chris Brown (University of Portsmouth, UK)
Jane Flood (Netley Marsh C of E Infant School, UK)

Formalise, Prioritise and Mobilise: How School Leaders Secure the Benefits of Professional Learning Networks

ISBN: 978-1-78769-778-2, eISBN: 978-1-78769-775-1

Publication date: 4 January 2019

This content is currently only available as a PDF

Citation

Brown, C. and Flood, J. (2019), "Index", Formalise, Prioritise and Mobilise: How School Leaders Secure the Benefits of Professional Learning Networks (Emerald Professional Learning Networks Series), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 111-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-775-120181007

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019 Chris Brown and Jane Flood


INDEX

Note: Page numbers followed by “n” with numbers indicate notes.

Bildungsbegriff
, 8

Boundary objects
, 51, 90–91

Brokerage
, 54–57, 96

providing ‘how to’ support
, 47–48, 68–69

school-level brokerage
, 28

time for
, 75

to whole school
, 26–29

within-school Professional Learning Communities
, 48–50

Case study approach
, 15

‘Cause and effect’ relationship
, 53

Coding structure/frame
, 18

of interviews
, 18–20

from second set of interviews
, 34–36

Collective responsibility for student learning
, 92

Continuing Professional Development (CPD)
, 29n3

Deprivatisation of practice
, 92–93

Developing, through consultation, common purpose” concept
, 96

Distributed pedagogic leadership
, 67

Education(al)
, 8

leadership programmes
, 97

systems
, 1

Enquiry-related practices
, 24–25

Experience and external knowledge/theory
, 93–94

Flybjerg
, 94

Formal meetings
, 42, 75, 84

Formalisation
, 79, 81–90, 95

PLN activity as priority
, 23–24

RLN activity
, 34, 36–40, 72, 74

How to support approach
, 68–69

IN-SErvice Training day (INSET day)
, 29n1

Individual schools, actions undertaken by
, 53, 55–65

examining problems of practice and learning
, 72–74

formalising participant’s engagement in RLN
, 67–69

participant’s performance and time commitment
, 70–72

RLN process
, 53–54, 66–67

strong on formalising RLN
, 74–75

used whole process
, 69–70

Informal catch-up sessions
, 42

Informal professional discourse
, 75

Informing non-RLN staff
, 34, 44–47

Instructional leadership
, 18

Interactive communication
, 90–91

Interpretation process
, 18

Interviews
, 31

coding structure
, 18–20

coding structure from second set of interviews
, 34–36

findings from first set of interviews
, 21

Keeping participating staff on track
, 34, 40–42

Knowledge

creation
, 12, 93

mobilisation
, 89, 91–95

networks
, 96

Knowledge brokerage
, 47, 66

codes
, 50–51

to support ‘how to’/bespoke support approaches
, 90–91

Leadership
, 5

activity
, 17

approach
, 67

characteristics
, 17–18

distributed pedagogic
, 67

effective
, 17

instructional
, 18

pedagogic
, 18

role in PLNs
, 5–7

transformational aspects of
, 18

Learning

conversations
, 93

networks
, 2–3, 5

and practice development
, 79

Macrolevel codes
, 34, 36

Meta-analysis
, 8

Mobilisation
, 79, 81–91, 95, 98n1

knowledge
, 91–95

of PLN
, 7

RLN activity
, 11–12

Mutual learning
, 12

Networks
, 77

New Forest Research Learning Network
, 9, 13–14

brokerage to whole school
, 26–29

case study approach
, 15

characteristics of effective leadership
, 17–18

coding structure
, 18–20

findings from first set of interviews
, 21

interviews
, 16–17

maintaining focus on PLN activity once back in school
, 21–24

providing resource to support engagement
, 24–26

Non-RLN staff
, 66–67

Opinion Former
, 10, 13, 16, 28–29, 48

Participants

behaviour
, 77

collaborate
, 92

participant-level improvements
, 68

Pedagogic leadership
, 18

Performance management
, 66

Preparation and assessment time (PPA time)
, 44

Principles level
, 90

Prioritisation
, 79, 81–90

Professional development day
, (see IN-SErvice Training day (INSET day))

Professional Development Meetings (PDM)
, 29n2

Professional learning communities (PLCs)
, 12, 21, 44, 48–49, 71, 77–79, 91–95

Professional learning networks (PLNs)
, 2–5, 14, 79

activity
, 84

leadership role in
, 5–7

maintaining focus on PLN activity
, 21–24

mobilising RLN activity
, 11–12

research questions
, 12–13

school leaders
, 1–2

terminology
, 14

Reflection process
, 18

Reflective dialogue
, 92–93

Reflective professional inquiry
, 92–93

Research Learning Networks (RLN)
, 7–11, 14, 21

inclusion of RLN activity
, 38

mobilising RLN activity
, 11–12

process
, 32, 53–54, 69, 74, 78

Research-informed practices
, 9, 10, 11

Research-informed teaching practice (RITP)
, 7–8, 31, 33, 43, 53

RLN Schools

brokers
, 50–51

coding structure from second set of interviews
, 34–36

formalising RLN activity as priority
, 36–40

informing non-RLN staff
, 44–47

keeping participating staff on track
, 40–42

providing ‘how to’ support
, 47–48

research question
, 31

time
, 43–44

ToA to both developing interventions and ascertain impact
, 32–34

whole staff engagement
, 48–50

School Improvement Plan (SIP)
, 36, 42, 54, 67, 69, 70, 72

School leaders
, 9, 14, 24, 26, 79

School-level brokerage
, 28

Schools, participation
, 95

‘Self-improving’ approaches
, 79

Senior leaders
, 6, 7, 14, 16, 26

Start small approach
, 27, 44–45, 66, 73, 75

Sustainability
, 78

Teacher development day
, (see IN-SErvice Training day (INSET day))

Teacher education programs
, 1

Teaching strategy
, 72

Theory of action approach (ToA approach)
, 31, 53, 71

to both developing interventions and ascertain impact
, 32–34

Time
, 25–26, 34, 43–44

Top-down model
, 54

Transformational aspects of leadership
, 18

Trial and error
, 90–91

Trust-laden approach
, 41

Twilight sessions
, 29n3, 48–49, 70

Whole school approach
, 68

to knowledge mobilisation
, 91–95

Whole school brokerage for PLN
, 27

Whole staff engagement
, 28, 34, 48–50

Whole-school collaborative approach
, 70, 89

Within-school Professional Learning Communities
, 48, 50, 70