Index

Citation

Weitkamp, E. and Almeida, C. (2022), "Index", Science & Theatre: Communicating Science and Technology with Performing Arts, Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 213-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-640-420221020

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022 Emma Weitkamp and Carla Almeida

---

INDEX

Note: Page numbers followed by “n” indicate notes.

Adapting formats

, 73–75

Affective connection

, 48

Alternative science plays

, 17, 19

Ancient Greece

, 3

Art-science (Sci-art)

, 33, 35, 38, 89, 149

activities

, 33

collaborations

, 38–39

discourse

, 144–145

practices

, 53

projects

, 37–39

Artsci model

, 159–160

Artsci residencies

, 160

Association of Science and Technology Centers (ASTC)

, 174

Audience

, 43–45

conceptualising

, 86–88

with connection to science or theatre

, 118–119

cultural elite

, 88

measuring audience responses

, 95–99

outcomes

, 91–95

qualitative methods

, 98–99

quantitative methods

, 97

reception studies

, 21, 85, 91, 95, 99, 187

research vs. evaluation

, 96–97

socio-demographic profile

, 85, 89, 96–97, 188, 197, 199

theatre and spectators

, 94–95

Audience engagement

, 45, 144

Augmented Lecture

, 144

art-science discourse

, 144–145

creation process

, 145

factors affecting outcome

, 146–150

Backstage process

, 107–108

Black and Indigenous People Of Color (BIPOC)

, 176

Brazilian science communication

, 113

Brecht, Bertolt

, 17, 94

A New Role for Theatre and Spectators

, 94

Life of Galileo

, 18, 69, 73

Ciência e teatro

, 16

Ciência em Cena

, 64

Circus

, 71

Co-constructing knowledge

, 92

Co-creation

, 11, 25, 46, 85, 87, 184

co-creator

, 85–99

design process

, 103

Cognitive component

, 92

Cognitive metaphors

, 6, 12, 158–161, 167

Cognitive response

, 22, 42, 62, 80, 83, 87, 91–3, 95, 97, 99, 184, 188

Collaborations

, 35–37

creating effective

, 49

establishing trust

, 50–51

evaluation and reflection

, 52

funding

, 52–53

negotiating commitment

, 49–50

science communication expertise

, 51

Collaborator

, 10–11, 33, 36–38, 186

Conative response

, 92, 95, 97–99, 184, 188

Conceptualising audiences

, 86–88

Conceptualising science-theatre

plethora of concepts

, 19–21

science communication

, 15, 21–24

science-in-theatre

, 18

science-theatre

, 24–26

Contemplative format

, 78–79, 82, 184

Contemporary science

, 18–19

Contemporary science-theatre topics

, 57–62

Contextualising science

, 43, 46–47

Copenhagen

, 3, 33

Corporate theatre (see ‘Industrial theatre’)

Cosmic Underground

, 80, 161–168

COVID-19 pandemic

, 12, 31, 38, 66, 78, 117, 153, 175

Creating science-theatre

art-science projects

, 37–39

collaborations

, 35–37

creating effective collaborations

, 49–53

creative practices

, 35

from education to spectacle

, 39–41

motivations behind science-theatre

, 39–49

survey respondents’ motivations

, 41–47

Cultural capital

, 103

Cultural elite

, 88

Deficit Model

, 3, 8, 20, 22–23, 48, 79, 86, 143, 183, 189

Demonstration

, 25, 63

experimental science

, 104

live

, 70–71

Demonstrative

formats

, 70–71, 78, 82

performances

, 184

Devised theatre

, 25

Dialogue

, 5, 8–9, 185

art-science

, 144

between arts and sciences

, 4

creating

, 24–26

forms of

, 82

opportunities for

, 153

promoting

, 41, 58

between science and theatre

, 24

styles of

, 73

theatrical practice of

, 77

Education

, 4, 5, 19, 24, 150

from education to spectacle

, 39–41

formal

, 91, 181

informal

, 118

intentions

, 47, 181

multiple visions of

, 189

science

, 37, 123, 133, 183

theatre

, 25

Educational theatre

, 122

Educator survey

, 127

‘Emancipated spectator’

, 87

Emotion/emotional

, 41, 79, 93–94

connection

, 45

engagement

, 44–45, 93

immediacy

, 174

impacts of theatre

, 93

reactions

, 91

response

, 92, 93, 184, 188

stimuli

, 62

values

, 87

Entertaining

, 46

Epic theatre

, 94

Equity, diversity and inclusivity

, 112

Escenas de la Vida Acuática (see Scenes of Aquatic Life)

European Network of Science Centres and Museums (Ecsite)

, 6, 28

European Researchers’ Night (ERN)

, 137

Evaluation

, 52, 53, 95, 96–97, 197–200

data

, 111

forum theatre approach

, 92

frameworks

, 189

of science-theatre projects

, 12

Formats

adopting, adapting and creating new formats

, 73–75

emerging participatory formats

, 75–78

interactions in practice

, 80–83

opportunities for participation

, 78–80

science communication

, 69

science communication goals

, 78–80

science-theatre traditional formats

, 70–73

Forum theatre

, 10, 74, 75–78, 82, 87, 184

approach for public engagement

, 92

performances

, 77–78

Fundamental goals (or motivations)

, 40–42, 48, 183

Funding

, 32–34, 52–53

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs)

, 8, 147

Hard sciences

, 36

History of science in theatre

, 18

Immersion

, 159–160

Immersive theatre

, 75–76

Improvisation

, 72, 87, 145–146, 154, 184

Industrial theatre

, 122

Informal science learning (ISL)

, 103

Institutional bonds

, 116–118

Interaction

, 69–83

Interdisciplinarity

, 59

International Museum Theater Alliance (IMTAL)

, 63

Jet Propulsion Theatre

, 148

Learning

experience

, 176–177

formal

, 24, 111

informal

, 24, 111

outcomes of science-theatre

, 93

stimulating

, 45–46

Lecture-performances

, 75

Life of Galileo

, 18, 52, 69, 73, 94

Living history

, 70

Mapping science-theatre practices

(central) issue of funding

, 32–34

institutions with science-theatre

, 31–32

profile of respondents

, 28–31

science-theatre activities

, 27

Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre (MARE)

, 136

Math class to theatre

, 170–174

Meaning making

, 11, 85–88, 93, 96, 98

Minnesota Fringe Festival

, 169

Monitoring and evaluation system

, 125–130, 133, 148

post-production questionnaires

, 148

post-workshop student surveys

, 126

pre-workshop student surveys

, 126

qualitative methods

, 98–99

quantitative methods

, 97

questionnaires

, 97

Motivations (and goals)

fundamental

, 41, 42

motivations behind science-theatre

, 47–49

personal

, 41, 42, 183

pragmatic

, 41, 42, 183

of survey respondents

, 41–47

Museu da Vida

, 11, 41, 50, 52, 63, 71, 90, 98, 113–119, 183

modus operandi

, 115

Museum theatre

, 62

Mysore Science Theatre Festival

, 64

Nano is Big

, 61, 77, 80

Narrative responses

, 126–128

National Museum for Science and Technology

, 135

Negotiating commitment

, 49–50

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)

, 7

Participative/participation

, 36, 70, 82, 174, 184

audience

, 6, 62, 77–78, 184–185

citizen

, 9

forms of

, 10

opportunities for

, 78–80

physical

, 87

of volunteers

, 70–71

Participatory formats

, 75–78

Pedagogy, pedagogical (see also Education, learning)

, 48, 58, 76

facet of the théâtre de sciences

, 22

intentions

, 184, 187

motivations

, 183, 189

theatrical traditions

, 5

Personal enrichment

, 48

Personal goals (and motivations)

, 38–44, 46, 48, 183

‘Personalised and localised’ theatrical experience

, 106

Physical theatre

, 12, 25, 121, 123–125, 130, 132–133

Play

, 36, 60–61, 73, 116

‘Pop-up’ festivals

, 106

Post-workshop student surveys

, 126

Pragmatic goals (and motivations)

, 39, 41, 42, 44–46, 48, 53, 183

Pre-workshop student surveys

, 126

Professional science-theatre

, 114–116

Public engagement

, 25, 33, 36, 38, 49–50, 188

Public spaces

, 65, 185

Public Communication of Science and Technology Network (PCST)

, 6

Public Engagement with Science

, 9, 20, 25, 44, 82–83, 107, 174, 182

Public engagement with science and technology framework (PEST framework)

, 87

Public Understanding of Science (PUS)

, 7–8, 38, 182

Public Understanding of Science and Technology (PCST)

, 28

Qualitative methods

, 98–99

Quantitative methods

, 97

Questionnaires

, 97

Reception studies

, 21, 85, 91, 95, 99, 187

RedPop

, 6, 28

Research

, 21, 96–97, 188–189

Royal Institution

, 79

Scenes of Aquatic Life

collaboration to transform

, 154–155

theatre as knowledge bridge

, 151–154

Science, technology, engineering, art and mathematics (STEAM)

, 5, 37

Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)

, 12, 37, 103

Science cabarets

, 74

Science capital

, 96, 103, 108, 111

Science communication

, 4, 15, 21–24, 36, 69

expertise

, 51

goals

, 78–80

storytelling (and narrative), in

, 5, 45, 63, 72–73, 103–104, 107–108, 111–112, 145, 172–173

paradigms

, 6–9

storytelling in

, 105

Science festivals (inc science theatre festivals)

, 6, 10, 32, 39, 56, 62–3, 105–6, 124, 126, 145, 149, 170

Science Literacy

, 7, 24, 182

Science museums

, 24, 62–63, 65, 71, 90, 113–114, 136, 142, 182–183

Science plays

, 17, 20, 21

Science shows

, 70–71

Science Slams

, 74

Science theatre

in South Africa

, 122–124

in UK context

, 104–105

rise and rise of

, 4–6

traditional formats

, 70–73

Science-engaged performance

, 19

Science-engaged theatre

, 16

Science-in-theatre

, 18

Science-performance

, 19

Site-specific storytelling

, 159–160

Skit

, 72

SMASH-UK Programme

, 39, 103, 105–108

Socio-demographic factors

, 96

Socio-demographic measures

, 89

Spectator

, 86–87

theatre and

, 94–95

Stand-up comedy

, 72–74

Stimulating learning

, 45–46

Story of Festival

, 160

Storytelling

, 63, 72

in science communication

, 5, 45, 63, 72–73, 103–105, 107–108, 111–112, 145, 172–173

Teatro científico

, 16

Teatro de temática científica

, 16

Teatro della Meraviglia (TdM)

, 64, 148

Teatro scientifico

, 16, 22, 23

Theatre and science

, 17, 23, 25, 41, 44, 70, 90, 118, 135–136, 139, 142, 185

Théâtre de science

, 19, 22

Théâtre de vulgarización de la science

, 16

Théâtre et science

, 19

Theatre interventions (see Theatrical visit)

Theatre of the Oppressed

, 76

Théâtre scientifique

, 16, 23

Brazilian science communication

, 113

institutional bonds

, 116–118

professional science-theatre

, 114–116

Theatrical visit

, 71

Topics

contemporary science-theatre topics

, 57–62

and content

, 55–57

place hosting science-theatre

, 65–67

traditional venues for science

, 62–65

Trust

, 50–51

Underserved audience

, 11, 44, 111

Venues

, 55–67

Virtual theatre

, 66, 75

Walking Tall Educational Theatre Project

, 121

social value of prehistory through

, 124–125

Walking Tall’s impact

, 125–130

World Health Organization

, 117–118

Zoom platform

, 38, 75, 78, 81, 175–176