Toward a framework of improving horizontal and social accountability mechanisms: Case studies in Asia
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to develop a conceptual framework for improving the interaction between horizontal and social accountability mechanisms for enhanced accountability outcomes.
Design/methodology/approach
This is a conceptual paper drawing on six published anti-corruption cases in the Asian region and in theory to develop a framework for understanding and improving the interaction between horizontal and social accountability mechanisms.
Findings
The paper proposes that to have more improved interactions between horizontal and social accountability mechanisms, any or all of the following eight conditions must be met. These include, independence and capacity of horizontal accountability agencies; legal backing for horizontal and social accountability interaction; vibrant and independent media; strong partnership of civil society with the media for information dissemination; organisation of civil society into groups; credibility of horizontal and social accountability mechanisms; capacity of civil society (including human and financial capacity); horizontal accountability mechanisms to support and motivate social mechanism to “blow the alarm”.
Originality/value
The conceptual framework developed in this paper makes a significant contribution to the accountability literature. In terms of policy, this framework can serve as a tool for governments, especially in Asia, seeking good governance through enhanced accountability outcomes.
Keywords
Acknowledgements
This paper is part of a PhD research funded by Griffith University. The author is grateful to Professor A.J. Brown for his guidance and comments on the earlier versions of this paper. The author is also grateful to the anonymous reviewers and the journal editor Professor Ka Ho Mok for their constructive comments.
Citation
Ankamah, S.S. (2016), "Toward a framework of improving horizontal and social accountability mechanisms: Case studies in Asia", Asian Education and Development Studies, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 288-304. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-09-2015-0043
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited