An investigation of lead benchmarking implementation: A comparison of small/medium enterprises and large companies

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to explore current levels of lead benchmarking implementation and lead performance indicators among Malaysian organizations. Comparing small and medium enterprises (SMEs) with large companies, it identifies what benefits and difficulties are present during benchmarking implementation.

Design/methodology/approach

Descriptive analyses, one-way ANOVAs between and within groups, and parametric and non-parametric tests are used to compare responses obtained from small, medium and large Malaysian manufacturing organizations.

Findings

Findings suggest that larger organizations have a more progressive approach to lead benchmarking. Strategy and employee development are dominant lead performance indicators of continuous improvement. Large companies experience fewer challenges when implementing benchmarking projects. Perceptions of key benchmarking implementation barriers shift from mere lack of resources toward lack of knowledge and training, information sharing, commitment and trust.

Research limitations/implications

The sample is specific in nature (Malaysian manufacturing organizations); results should be interpreted accordingly.

Originality/value

Little is known about lead benchmarking practices in Malaysia, particularly within the contexts of SMEs. The outcomes of this study provide a basis for further improvement and valuable knowledge for top management of manufacturing organizations to refine strategies and advance quality management approaches.

Citation

Zeinalnezhad, M., Mukhtar, M. and Sahran, S. (2014), "An investigation of lead benchmarking implementation: A comparison of small/medium enterprises and large companies", Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 121-145. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2011-0074