To read this content please select one of the options below:

Mandatory annual report filings of private companies – why late or missing?

Laivi Laidroo (Department of Economics and Finance, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia)
Merle Küttim (Department of Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia)
Kirsti Rumma (Department of Economics and Finance, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia)
Paavo Siimann (Department of Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia)
Mari Avarmaa (Department of Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia)

Baltic Journal of Management

ISSN: 1746-5265

Article publication date: 28 November 2023

Issue publication date: 2 January 2024

90

Abstract

Purpose

This study explores the causes of delayed mandatory annual report filings of private companies in Estonia.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors use an online survey targeting companies that had submitted annual reports for 2017 late (late-filers) or failed to submit these by July 2020 (non-filers). The responses of 492 late-filers and 122 non-filers are analysed with exploratory factor analysis, Mann–Whitney U-Test and logistic regression.

Findings

Annual report filing decisions of both, late-filers and non-filers, are strongly driven by administrative costs attached to the preparation and submission of reports with non-filers perceiving these to be significantly greater. The relevance of other disclosure-related costs and benefits remains similar for both late-filers and non-filers. While proprietary and privacy concerns remain rather unimportant, benefits of timely disclosure, in the form of access to financing and possibilities to continue ordinary business activities, remain important disclosure timing drivers.

Practical implications

Policy interventions should focus on preventive measures that hinder companies' ordinary business activities in case of non-compliance to reporting deadlines. Monetary sanctions can be used to strengthen the desired behaviour alongside broader clarification of the purpose of mandatory reporting and available exemptions.

Originality/value

The authors propose an empirically testable comprehensive one-period model of disclosure timing decisions of private companies differentiating late-filers and non-filers. The authors address the limitations of previous studies through a survey that allows the authors to draw direct inferences about the trade-offs between different decision drivers and the motivations behind managers' disclosure timing decisions.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to highlight the professional attitude, cooperativeness, support and thorough feedback by Mirjam Suurekivi. The help provided by former Master’s students Kätlin Kallakas and Kristina Kips for carrying out the survey and some of the interviews is highly appreciated. The authors also thank their colleagues Liis Ojamäe, Natalie Aleksandra Gurvitš-Suits, Mari-Liis Kukk and Merli Reidolf for their support in the execution of this study. The authors remain thankful to participants of the 13th International Conference “Evolving Challenges in European Economies”, Sefik Istemihan Demirag and four anonymous referees for their feedback and advice. The authors also thank the participants of the interviews and surveys for their valuable insights and time.

Citation

Laidroo, L., Küttim, M., Rumma, K., Siimann, P. and Avarmaa, M. (2024), "Mandatory annual report filings of private companies – why late or missing?", Baltic Journal of Management, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 123-144. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-11-2022-0431

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles