To read this content please select one of the options below:

Exploring disaster ontologies from Chinese and Western perspectives: commonalities and nuances

Susie Goodall (School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK)
Yajun Li (Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China)
Ksenia Chmutina (School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK)
Tom Dijkstra (School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK)
Xingmin Meng (Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China)
Colm Jordan (British Geological Survey, Edinburgh, UK)

Disaster Prevention and Management

ISSN: 0965-3562

Article publication date: 6 December 2021

Issue publication date: 2 June 2022

212

Abstract

Purpose

This paper explores ontological assumptions of disasters and introduces some concepts from Chinese disaster scholarship. The authors suggest an approach to explore and engage with different ontologies of disaster without direct comparison, that can further interdisciplinary and cross-cultural collaboration.

Design/methodology/approach

By reviewing the academic literature and focussing on two recent key translational texts by Chinese scholars, the authors show what can be revealed about ontology and the potential influence on thinking about human-environment interactions and disaster risk reduction (DRR) policy.

Findings

In Chinese disaster studies, the goal of a “harmonious human-environment relationship” is a foundational concept. There is a clear hierarchical and ontological distinction between humans and the natural ecological system viewed as an integrated whole, with underlying rules that can be discovered by scientific research to enable management of a harmonious relationship.

Practical implications

The authors suggest a practical way to begin with the following questions: What is the societal goal/aim? What is nature? What is society? How do these interact to create disasters? And what are the implications for DRR research and practice? The authors also demonstrate the importance of probing and understanding the underlying ontologies that are the foundation for theory, which in turn is the foundation for policy and action.

Originality/value

Identification of ontological differences in interdisciplinary and cross-cultural research collaborations and working across these boundaries is challenging and rarely questioned. Yet, as demonstrated here, considering ontological assumptions of the causes of disaster, within and across cultures and disciplines, is essential for collaboration and further research.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Funding: This research was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council, the UK (Award number: NE/L002493/1 and NE/R000069/1).

Citation

Goodall, S., Li, Y., Chmutina, K., Dijkstra, T., Meng, X. and Jordan, C. (2022), "Exploring disaster ontologies from Chinese and Western perspectives: commonalities and nuances", Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-03-2021-0108

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles