To read this content please select one of the options below:

A novel approach for construction disputes causal inferences based on empirical data: a case-controlled method combined with Bradford Hill criteria

Peipei Wang (School of Civil and Ocean Engineering, Jiangsu Ocean University, Lianyungang, China)
Peter Fenn (School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK)
Kun Wang (School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK)

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

ISSN: 0969-9988

Article publication date: 5 June 2023

108

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to devise a case-controlled method combined with Bradford Hill criteria for causal inference of contractual disputes in construction projects. It is a genuine attempt in a systematic method from research design to execution for causal issues where only observational data is available.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors located insufficient top management support as the putative pathogen of construction disputes based on a literature review, an interview and Delphi surveys. A questionnaire survey was then conducted to collect case-controlled data to ensure comparability, in which for each disputed project put in the experimental group, the authors sought for a dispute-free project of similar characteristics. The incidence rates of insufficient top management support in the experimental and control groups were then examined by Bradford Hill criteria as an alternative to the test of intervention effect.

Findings

The association of insufficient top management support and construction disputes was tested to conform with the Bradford Hill criteria with case-controlled data where applicable and logical deduction where statistical tests were not applicable. With a clear, positive, reasonable and statistically significant association, while excluding methodological biases, confounding and chance, the authors reached a causal verdict of insufficient top management support causing contractual disputes.

Originality/value

This paper supports the validity of applying a case-controlled method combined with Bradford Hill criteria in investigating causal issues in project management, especially the verdict of causal inference based on empirical data. In addition, the located root cause of contractual disputes could inform project management personnel with reasoned strategies for dispute avoidance.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Sincerest gratitude would be given to the Delphi survey, interview survey and questionnaire survey respondents from universities and construction companies for sparing their valuable time and invaluable experience with us.

Citation

Wang, P., Fenn, P. and Wang, K. (2023), "A novel approach for construction disputes causal inferences based on empirical data: a case-controlled method combined with Bradford Hill criteria", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2022-0882

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles