To read this content please select one of the options below:

Power imbalance issues in athlete sponsorship versus endorsement in the context of a scandal

François Anthony Carrillat (Marketing Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia)
Alain d’Astous (Department of Marketing, HEC Montréal, Montréal, Canada)

European Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0309-0566

Article publication date: 6 May 2014

3884

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to contrast athlete endorsement vs athlete sponsorship from a power imbalance perspective when a scandal strikes the athlete.

Design/methodology/approach

A first study was conducted with a probabilistic sample of 252 adult consumers where the type of brand–athlete relationship (endorsement or sponsorship) and the level of congruence between the two entities (low or high) were manipulated in a mixed experimental design. A second study with a probabilistic sample of 118 adult consumers was conducted to demonstrate that consumers perceive that the balance of power between the brand and the athlete is not the same in endorsement and sponsorship situations.

Findings

The results of the first study showed that when an athlete is in the midst of a scandal, the negative impact on the associated brand is stronger in the case of an endorsement than in the case of a sponsorship. However, this occurs only when the brand–athlete relationship is congruent. The results of the second study showed that the athlete’s power relative to the brand is greater in an endorsement than in a sponsorship context.

Research limitations/implications

The findings suggest that a company that worries about the possibility that the athlete with whom it wants to build a relationship be eventually associated with some negative event (e.g. a scandal) should consider sponsorship rather than endorsement as a strategy.

Originality/value

This study is the first to compare the athlete endorsement and sponsorship strategies in general and the first to put forward the notion of power imbalance in brand–athlete partnerships, its impact on how the two entities are represented in consumers’ memory networks and the consequences on brand attitude when the athlete is associated with a negative event.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Cédric Bélanger and Josianne Lazure for their help in collecting the data that served in this research and HEC Montréal for its financial support. Part of the writing for this article was completed while François Carrillat was a visiting scholar at the University of Adelaide, Australia.

Citation

Anthony Carrillat, F. and d’Astous, A. (2014), "Power imbalance issues in athlete sponsorship versus endorsement in the context of a scandal", European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 48 No. 5/6, pp. 1070-1091. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2011-0688

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles