To read this content please select one of the options below:

Action and inaction regret in fine-dining decisions: the impact of the focal customer, sommelier and dining companion

Demi Shenrui Deng (School of Hospitality Business Management, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA)
Soobin Seo (School of Hospitality Business Management, Washington State University, Everett, Washington, USA)
Robert J. Harrington (School of Hospitality Business Management, Washington State University, Tri-Cities, Washington, USA)

International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management

ISSN: 0959-6119

Article publication date: 31 March 2023

Issue publication date: 8 November 2023

370

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to unearth antecedents of regrettable dining experiences related to the information source, action and inaction perspectives, dining companion influence and interactions among information source, the focal customer’s valence and the dining companion’s valence on regret, leading to sequential behavioral outcomes.

Design/methodology/approach

Using a scenario-based experimental study, 344 qualified questionnaires were collected. Univariate ANOVA and multiple linear regression analyses were implemented.

Findings

The results of this study reveal that action regret is more intense than inaction regret during the choice-making phase; dining companion negative feedback intensifies focal customer’s regret. The significance of the information source on regret disappeared when only one party reported negative feedback; conversely, when two parties in the co-consumption experience revealed negative feedback, the relationship between information source of choice and regret was sustained.

Research limitations/implications

The nature of scenario-based design may lack realism. Thus, more field experiments are encouraged to test the propositions further. This research enhances our understanding of gastronomic experiences in a negative disconfirmation context, drawing upon action/inaction regret theory, attribution theory and the expectancy disconfirmation model.

Practical implications

From a triad relationship perspective, this study provides valuable input on who or what will be attributed to the issues when encountering a food and wine sensory failure. Additionally, insightful recommendations are supplied on avoiding the possibility of inducing the experience of regret and how practitioners can increase the potential for a memorable dining experience.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that enriched the existing knowledge of regrettable dining experiences relating to information sources and social influence.

Keywords

Citation

Deng, D.S., Seo, S. and Harrington, R.J. (2023), "Action and inaction regret in fine-dining decisions: the impact of the focal customer, sommelier and dining companion", International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 35 No. 12, pp. 4238-4258. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-09-2022-1070

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles