To read this content please select one of the options below:

Comparative analysis on pneumatic compact spinning systems

Xinjin Liu (School of Textile and Clothing, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China AND Jiangsu Susi Silk Limited Company, Suqian, China.)
Hong Zhang (School of Textile and Clothing, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China)
Xuzhong Su (School of Textile and Clothing, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China)

International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology

ISSN: 0955-6222

Article publication date: 1 August 2016

281

Abstract

Purpose

Pneumatic compact spinning is the most widely used compact spinning method at present, in which the negative pressure airflow is used to condense the fiber bundle and decrease the spinning triangle. Compact spinning with perforated drum and lattice apron are mainly two kinds of pneumatic compact spinning now. The purpose of this paper is to study the comparative analysis on four kinds of pneumatic compact spinning systems, including two kinds of compact spinning with perforated drum: Rieter’s COM4 and complete condensing spinning (CCS), two kinds of compact spinning with lattice apron: Sussen’s three-line compact spinning (TLCS) and Toyota’s four-line compact spinning (FLCS).

Design/methodology/approach

First, the basic properties of four systems were introduced and comparatively analyzed. Then, the 29.2 tex (20S), 14.6 tex (40S), 9.7 tex (60S) and 7.3 tex (80S) combed cotton yarns were spun in the four pneumatic compact spinning systems and ring spinning system, respectively. The evenness, breaking strength and hairiness of spun yarns were tested. Finally, the properties of corresponding woven fabric were tested.

Findings

It is shown that comparing to compact spinning with lattice apron, the disposable input cost of compact spinning with perforated drum is higher, but the maintenance cost is lower. Comparing to compact spinning with lattice apron, the evenness of yarn spun by compact spinning with perforated drum is improved whereas the breaking strength is decreased. Furthermore, although harmful long hairiness (=3 mm) of yarn spun by CCS is a little more, the beneficial short hairiness (1-2 mm) is also more, which can make the fabric fullness and have better comfortable feeling.

Originality/value

In the paper, comparative analysis on four kinds of pneumatic compact spinning systems, compact spinning with perforated drum: Rieter’s COM4 and CCS, and compact spinning with lattice apron: Sussen’s TLCS and Toyota’s FLCS, were studied. The basic properties, spun yarn qualities and properties of corresponding woven fabric of four systems were analyzed comparatively.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of P.R. China under Grant 11102072, the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province under Grant (BK20151359), Prospective industry-university-research project of Jiangsu Province (BY2014023-13, BY2015019-10), Prospective industry-university-research project of Guangdong Province (2013B090600038).

Citation

Liu, X., Zhang, H. and Su, X. (2016), "Comparative analysis on pneumatic compact spinning systems", International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 400-419. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCST-09-2015-0104

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles