To read this content please select one of the options below:

Early warning scores: unravelling detection and escalation

Gary B Smith (Centre of Postgraduate Medical Research and Education (CoPMRE), Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK)
David R Prytherch (Clinical Scientist, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK and Visiting Professor, Centre for Healthcare Modelling and Informatics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.)
Paul Meredith (Research & Innovation, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK)
Paul E Schmidt (Acute Medicine, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK)

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

ISSN: 0952-6862

Article publication date: 12 October 2015

2013

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to increase understanding of how patient deterioration is detected and how clinical care escalates when early warning score (EWS) systems are used.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors critically review a recent National Early Warning Score paper published in IJHCQA using personal experience and EWS-related publications, and debate the difference between detection and escalation.

Findings

Incorrect EWS choice or poorly understood EWS escalation may result in unnecessary workloads forward and responding staff.

Practical implications

EWS system implementers may need to revisit their guidance materials; medical and nurse educators may need to expand the curriculum to improve EWS system understanding and use.

Originality/value

The paper raises the EWS debate and alerts EWS users that scrutiny is required.

Keywords

Citation

Smith, G.B., Prytherch, D.R., Meredith, P. and Schmidt, P.E. (2015), "Early warning scores: unravelling detection and escalation", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 28 No. 8, pp. 872-875. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-07-2015-0086

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles