To read this content please select one of the options below:

The influence of sports policies on the right to fair competition for women

Marcelo Rocha Nasser Hissa (Centro de Diabetes e Doenças Endócrino-Metabólicas, Unichristus, Fortaleza-CE, Brazil)
Miguel Nasser Hissa (Centro de Diabetes e Doenças Endócrino-Metabólicas, Unichristus, Fortaleza-CE, Brazil)

International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare

ISSN: 2056-4902

Article publication date: 13 August 2021

Issue publication date: 28 June 2023

179

Abstract

Purpose

Competitions in high-performance sports are based on the premise of fairness and the absence of advantages for participants. Therefore, several metrics were created to divide participants into categories and neutralize the advantages of some athletes. The division by sex is justified in the face of differences in body development between men and women due to testosterone levels. Faced with the difficulties of determining a single unequivocal criterion for determining sex, major sports entities periodically change the rules that guide the inclusion criteria to compete in the female category. The purpose of this study is to assess whether changes in gender metric rules bring female sports performance closer to male performance, reducing the equality of conditions for female competitors.

Design/methodology/approach

This is a retrospective study that compared female and male results from the past 5 Olympic games in the 100-metre dash, high jump and javelin throw.

Findings

The performance in the men's category in the 100-metre dash was superior to the women's in the Olympic Games in Sydney by 8.78% (± 0.16), in Athens by 9.88% (± 0.21), in Beijing by 10.11% (± 0.29), in London by 9.25% (± 0.59) and in Rio de Janeiro by 8.6% (± 0.23). The male high jump was higher than the female by 17.24% (± 1.18) in Sydney, 16.61% (± 1.83) in Athens, 17.01% (± 1.79) in Beijing, 15.47% (± 1.96 higher) in London and 19.67% (± 1.09) in Rio de Janeiro. In the javelin throw, the male superiority was 34.87% (± 2.35) in Sydney, 29.88% (± 4.15) in Athens, 31.87% (± 4.15) in Beijing, 29.44% (± 3.24) in London and 32.31% (± 2.69) in Rio de Janeiro.

Research limitations/implications

As limitations of the study, this study mentions the lack of hormonal dosage of the athletes involved, the non-evaluation of other modalities with different dynamics of execution and muscular requirements and the non-evaluation of the rules in sexual metrics during the qualifying stages for the games.

Practical implications

In this manuscript, the authors show that interference of the International Olympic Committee in the sex metric influences the athletic performance of women in some sports. Rules that facilitate participation of transgender athletes, or with sexual differentiation disorder and other forms of hyperandrogenism, improve female athletic performance overall.

Originality/value

The authors believe that this manuscript is appropriate for publication by International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare because it is an original paper that fits the goals of the publication. This manuscript creates a paradigm for future policies that rule the sex determination metrics in competitive sports.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Funding source: No funding source was used to carry out this study. Disclosure of conflict of interest: No conflicting interests of any author.

Citation

Hissa, M.R.N. and Hissa, M.N. (2023), "The influence of sports policies on the right to fair competition for women", International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 120-127. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-04-2021-0084

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles