To read this content please select one of the options below:

The learning study approach to comparing two typologies of the cost concept for project management teaching

Eddie W.L. Cheng (Department of Social Sciences, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies

ISSN: 2046-8253

Article publication date: 10 October 2016

284

Abstract

Purpose

The epistemology of project management has been considered imperfect because the gap between theory and practice has not become closer due to unsatisfactory project performance. Without effective learning, the transfer of learning to the workplace would be uncertain. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to use the learning study approach, exploring the value of Variation Theory in comparing two typologies of the cost concept for project management teaching.

Design/methodology/approach

To illustrate the application of the theory of variation, a case of teaching the two major cost typologies was demonstrated. A pedagogical setting was designed from the theory for helping students discern the object of learning.

Findings

Students of the target cohort had much fewer errors than previous cohorts in transforming the costs of the first typology used in project management textbooks to those of the second typology used in Microsoft Project.

Originality/value

This is perhaps the first case study to appreciate the use of Variation Theory in project management teaching. Apparently, thinking of how to induce learning and facilitate the transfer of learning should be a productive way for creating excellence in practice.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and the Chief Editor, Professor John Elliott, for their constructive comments on earlier drafts of the paper.

Citation

Cheng, E.W.L. (2016), "The learning study approach to comparing two typologies of the cost concept for project management teaching", International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 300-312. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-11-2015-0039

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles