To read this content please select one of the options below:

Accessing opioid agonist treatment in prison in England and Scotland remains problematic – the views of people with lived experience

Russell Webster (Freelance Researcher based in Rainham, UK)
Colin Fearns (Pharmacist based in Liverpool, UK)
Paula Harriott (Prison Reform Trust, London, UK)
Lisa Millar (Scottish Recovery Consortium, Glasgow, UK)
Jardine Simpson (Scottish Recovery Consortium, Glasgow, UK)
Jason Wallace (Scottish Drug Forum, Glasgow, UK)
Michael Wheatley (Leeds Trinity University, Leeds, UK)

International Journal of Prison Health

ISSN: 2977-0254

Article publication date: 26 December 2023

71

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine lived experiences of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) during and immediately following release from detention in prisons in England and Scotland.

Design/methodology/approach

Surveys were completed by serving prisoners in both countries and by those recently released from prison (England only). The survey findings were discussed in focus groups of people with lived experience. The combined findings from the surveys and focus groups were shared with an expert group of prison OAT providers and people with lived experience with the purpose of making recommendations for more accessible and effective OAT in custodial environments and continuity of OAT on release

Findings

The quality and accessibility of OAT varied considerably between establishments. It was reported to be harder to access OAT in Scottish prisons. It was often hard for people in prison to get the dosage of OAT they felt they needed and it was generally harder to access buprenorphine than methadone in English prisons. Only Scottish people in prison were aware of long-lasting forms of buprenorphine. People in English prisons had mixed experiences of the help available in prison, with no improvement recorded since a 2016 study. People in Scottish prisons were more likely to rate the help available as poor.

Research limitations/implications

The number of people accessed while actually in prison (73) was reduced by the impact of the pandemic, making it more difficult to access people in prison and because some were resistant to participating on the basis that they had already been consulted for a wide variety of research projects focused on the impact of COVID. The Scottish cohort (a total of 19 individuals comprising 14 survey respondents and five focus group members) is clearly too small a number on which to base robust claims about differences in OAT provision between the English and Scottish prison systems..

Practical implications

The study identifies key barriers to accessing OAT in prisons and suggests key components of more user-friendly approaches.

Social implications

This study provides an overview of the recent lived experiences of people accessing OAT in prison and on release and offers valuable recommendations on how to make service provision more effective and consistent.

Originality/value

This study provides an overview of the recent lived experiences of people accessing OAT in prison and on release in England and Scotland and offers valuable recommendations on how to make service provision more effective and consistent.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Funding: Camurus.

Disclosure of interest: The research was supported by funding from Camurus. Camurus had no input into the design of the research, nor the analysis and publication of the results.

Citation

Webster, R., Fearns, C., Harriott, P., Millar, L., Simpson, J., Wallace, J. and Wheatley, M. (2023), "Accessing opioid agonist treatment in prison in England and Scotland remains problematic – the views of people with lived experience", International Journal of Prison Health, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPH-05-2023-0025

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles