To read this content please select one of the options below:

Experimental and numerical analysis on shear capacity of steel-reinforced geopolymer concrete beams with different shear span ratios

Jiahao Jiang (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China)
Jinliang Liu (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China)
Shuolei Cao (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China)
Sheng Cao (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China)
Rui Dong (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China)
Yusen Wu (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China)

International Journal of Structural Integrity

ISSN: 1757-9864

Article publication date: 7 May 2024

7

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to use the corrected stress field theory to derive the shear capacity of geopolymer concrete beams (GPC) and consider the shear-span ratio as a major factor affecting the shear capacity. This research aims to provide guidance for studying the shear capacity of GPC and to observe how the failure modes of beams change with the variation of the shear-span ratio, thereby discovering underlying patterns.

Design/methodology/approach

Three test beams with shear span ratios of 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 are investigated in this paper. For GPC beams with shear-span ratios of 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5, ultimate capacities are 337kN, 235kN and 195kN, respectively. Transitioning from 1.5 to 2.0 results in a 30% decrease in capacity, a reduction of 102kN. Moving from 2.0 to 2.5 sees a 17% decrease, with a loss of 40KN in capacity. A shear capacity formula, derived from modified compression field theory and considering concrete shear strength, stirrups and aggregate interlocking force, was validated through finite element modeling. Additionally, models with shear ratios of 1 and 3 were created to observe crack propagation patterns.

Findings

For GPC beams with shear-span ratios of 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5, ultimate capacities of 337KN, 235KN and 195KN are achieved, respectively. A reduction in capacity of 102KN occurs when transitioning from 1.5 to 2.0 and a decrease of 40KN is observed when moving from 2.0 to 2.5. The average test-to-theory ratio, at 1.015 with a variance of 0.001, demonstrates strong agreement. ABAQUS models beams with ratios ranging from 1.0 to 3.0, revealing crack trends indicative of reduced crack angles with higher ratios. The failure mode observed in the models aligns with experimental results.

Originality/value

This article provides a reference for the shear bearing capacity formula of geopolymer reinforced concrete (GRC) beams, addressing the limited research in this area. Additionally, an exponential model incorporating the shear-span ratio as a variable was employed to calculate the shear capacity, based on previous studies. Moreover, the analysis of shear capacity results integrated literature from prior research. By fitting previous experimental data to the proposed formula, the accuracy of this study's derived formula was further validated, with theoretical values aligning well with experimental results. Additionally, guidance is offered for utilizing ABAQUS in simulating the failure process of GRC beams.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Heilongjiang Province College Students' Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program Project (No: S202310225632),“Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China” (No: YQ 2022E002) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No: 2023M741503).

Citation

Jiang, J., Liu, J., Cao, S., Cao, S., Dong, R. and Wu, Y. (2024), "Experimental and numerical analysis on shear capacity of steel-reinforced geopolymer concrete beams with different shear span ratios", International Journal of Structural Integrity, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSI-02-2024-0028

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles