To read this content please select one of the options below:

Nudging eyewitnesses: the effect of social influence on recalling witnessed events

Kirk Luther (Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada)
Zak Keeping (Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada)
Brent Snook (Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada)
Hannah de Almeida (Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada)
Weyam Fahmy (Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada)
Alexia Smith (Department of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada)
Tianshuang Han (Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada)

Journal of Criminal Psychology

ISSN: 2009-3829

Article publication date: 25 August 2023

Issue publication date: 5 January 2024

91

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to contribute to the literature on information elicitation. The authors investigated the impact of social influence strategies on eyewitness recall performance. Specifically, the authors examined the effect of social influence techniques (Cialdini, 2007) on recall performance (Experiment 1) and conducted a follow-up experiment to examine the incremental effect of social proof on the report everything cognitive interview mnemonic (Experiment 2).

Design/methodology/approach

Participants watched a video depicting vandalism (Experiment 1: N = 174) or a verbal altercation (Experiment 2: N = 128) and were asked to recall the witnessed event. Experiment 1: Participants were assigned randomly to one of six conditions: control (open-ended prompt), engage and explain (interview ground rules), consistency (signing an agreement to work diligently), reciprocity (given water and food), authority (told of interviewer’s training) and social proof (shown transcript from an exemplar participant). Experiment 2: The authors used a 2 (social proof: present, absent) × 2 (report everything: present, absent) between-participants design.

Findings

Across both experiments, participants exposed to the social proof tactic (i.e. compared to a model exemplar) spoke longer and recalled more correct details than participants not exposed to the social proof tactic. In Experiment 2, participants interviewed with the report everything mnemonic also spoke longer, recalled more correct details, more incorrect details and provided slightly more confabulations than those not interviewed with the report everything mnemonic.

Originality/value

The findings have practical value for police investigators and other professionals who conduct interviews (e.g. military personnel, doctors obtaining information from patients). Interviewers can incorporate social proof in their interviewing practices to help increase the amount and accuracy of information obtained.

Keywords

Citation

Luther, K., Keeping, Z., Snook, B., de Almeida, H., Fahmy, W., Smith, A. and Han, T. (2024), "Nudging eyewitnesses: the effect of social influence on recalling witnessed events", Journal of Criminal Psychology, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-06-2023-0042

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles