Mapping romance fraud research – a systematic review
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to systematically review over two decades of academic articles on romance fraud to provide a holistic insight into this crime and identify literature gaps.
Design/methodology/approach
More than two decades of peer-reviewed academic journal articles from 2000 to 2023 were systematically reviewed using multiple search engines and databases for relevant papers, identified through searches of paper titles, keywords, abstracts and primary texts.
Findings
The findings reveal 10 themes: i) the definitions and terminology of romance fraud; ii) romance fraud’s impact on victims; iii) the profile of romance fraud criminals and victims; iv) romance fraud methods and techniques; v) why victims become susceptible to romance fraud; vi) the psychology of romance fraud criminals; vii) the links between romance fraud and other crimes; viii) the challenges of investigating romance fraud; ix) preventing romance fraud and protecting victims; and x) how romance fraud victims can be supported.
Practical implications
The paper reveals implications regarding the future direction of policy and strategy to address the pervasive low reporting rates and narratives of shame bound with victims of this crime.
Originality/value
Romance fraud is a serious crime against individuals with impacts beyond financial losses. Still, this fraud type is under-researched, and the literature lacks a holistic view of this crime. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first systematic literature review providing a holistic view of romance fraud. It combines evidence across the academic landscape to reveal the breadth and depth of the current work concerning romance fraud and identify gaps in the understanding of this fraud crime.
Keywords
Acknowledgements
Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable.
Consent for publication: Not applicable.
Availability of data and material: Not applicable.
Competing interests: The authors confirm that there are no competing interests to declare.
Acknowledgments: Not applicable.
Funding: No funding was obtained.
Authors' contributions: Dr Rasha Kassem is the lead author and was responsible for reviewing most studies, conducting the analysis, writing the first draft and reviewing the final draft. Dr Elisabeth Carter is the co-author and was responsible for reviewing and refining the first draft. Dr Carter’s contribution resulted in refining the methods, analysis, findings and discussion sections. She also added a few studies and reviewed the final draft.
Citation
Kassem, R. and Carter, E. (2023), "Mapping romance fraud research – a systematic review", Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-06-2023-0160
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited