To read this content please select one of the options below:

Transparency and budget savings in public procurement: evidence from Thailand’s Infrastructure Transparency Initiative (CoST)

Tippatrai Saelawong (Department of Good Regulatory Policy, Thailand Development Research Institute, Bangkok, Thailand)
Torplus Yomnak (The Knowledge Hub for Regional Anti-Corruption and Good Governance Collaboration (KRAC), Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand)
Thanee Chaiwat (Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, and)
Siwat Poopunpanich (Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, and)
Charoen Sutuktis (The Knowledge Hub for Regional Anti-Corruption and Good Governance Collaboration (KRAC), Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand)

Journal of Financial Crime

ISSN: 1359-0790

Article publication date: 5 December 2023

90

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluates the effect of transparency measures on public procurement efficiency, focusing on Thailand’s Infrastructure Transparency Initiative (CoST). This study aims to understand its impact on the country’s public infrastructure procurement practices.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper analyses Thailand’s government construction procurement data, focusing on budgetary savings and CoST process participation. Budgetary savings are this study dependent variable, while the main intervention variable is the adoption of the CoST data disclosure standard. This study uses multiple linear regression, fixed-effects model and propensity score matching with the logit model for a comprehensive analysis.

Findings

This study shows that using the CoST data disclosure leads to notable budget savings in Thai public construction procurement. With CoST’s introduction, the savings rose by Baht 9.6m, and even with added controls, the savings remained significant at around Baht 3.3m. The savings consistently stay near 5% across different models. The propensity score matching method confirms these results, consistent with factors such as open bidding and agency categorisation.

Research limitations/implications

This study might not capture all benefits, especially non-financial ones. Thailand’s unique context and potential biases in data sources also need consideration.

Practical implications

CoST evidence backs Thailand’s procurement transparency. This study recommends broadening CoST, streamlining online platforms and promoting digital public engagement. Training stakeholders and partnering with state-owned enterprises and local agencies is vital to align with CoST and mitigate risks.

Originality/value

This study shows a clear link between transparency from information disclosure and budget efficiency in public procurement, using data from Thailand. It highlights the potential of transparency measures in developing countries.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their thanks to the Anti-Corruption Organization of Thailand for making the CoST Initiative a reality in Thailand. They also express their gratitude to Thailand’s Comptroller General’s Department and Digital Government Development Agency for their invaluable open data contributions to this research. Their commitment to transparency in Thailand has significantly enriched their study.

Citation

Saelawong, T., Yomnak, T., Chaiwat, T., Poopunpanich, S. and Sutuktis, C. (2023), "Transparency and budget savings in public procurement: evidence from Thailand’s Infrastructure Transparency Initiative (CoST)", Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-10-2023-0282

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles