To read this content please select one of the options below:

Stakeholder expectations of the accountability of Malaysian State Islamic Religious Councils (SIRCS): to whom and for what?

Rosnia Masruki (Faculty of Economics and Muamalat, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Nilai, Malaysia)
Khaled Hussainey (Department of Accounting and Financial Management, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK)
Doaa Aly (Department of Accounting, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham, UK)

Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research

ISSN: 1759-0817

Article publication date: 18 March 2022

Issue publication date: 31 May 2022

433

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to examine stakeholders’ expectations of accountability in non-profit organisations (NPOs) in general, and State Islamic Religious Councils (SIRCs) in particular.

Design/methodology/approach

An online survey was used to collect data, which was then analysed descriptively. Furthermore, the differences between stakeholder groups were evaluated using the Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests.

Findings

The findings indicate that NPOs generally and SIRCs specifically need to clarify the meaning of accountability to meet the expectations of their stakeholders, especially the public, and to address accountability inquiries.

Research limitations/implications

The research method was a limitation of this study. The data was collected using a survey. Generally, surveys contain restricted numbers and types of questions that the authors have outlined. Consequently, respondents might be constrained in their choice of how they perceive accountability. So, surveys used to collect respondents’ opinions may have an adverse effect on their responses. In addition, a number of respondents may also give superficial answers, particularly if they are required to answer a number of questions over a long period of time. Finally, the data collected using surveys might show what respondents think about accountability, but they do not show the actual practice.

Practical implications

Owing the highest accountability to the Board of Directors is akin to the practices of corporations. The findings of this study could assist their top officials to understand the accountability chain within SIRCs. This is consistent with the findings regarding accountability within SIRCs, whereby they perceived that they are responsible to their board for performance. Therefore, this should encourage the reporting of performance to both internal and external stakeholders.

Originality/value

Overall, perceptions on accountability are an ongoing debate, and they depend on the role of the organisation and expectations of stakeholders. Identifying a clear accountability chain is essential to develop the best reporting practices for SIRCs. The paper contributes to the literature by addressing two questions on accountability for NPOs: to whom and for what.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This is part of Rosnia Masruki’s Ph.D Thesis is sponsored by employer, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia and Ministry of High Education, Malaysia.

Citation

Masruki, R., Hussainey, K. and Aly, D. (2022), "Stakeholder expectations of the accountability of Malaysian State Islamic Religious Councils (SIRCS): to whom and for what?", Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 760-777. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-04-2021-0130

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles