Citation
(2014), "2013 Awards for Excellence", Journal of Organizational Ethnography, Vol. 3 No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-04-2014-002
Publisher
:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2013 Awards for Excellence
Article Type: 2013 Awards for Excellence: Journal of Organizational Ethnography, Volume 3, Issue 1
The following article was selected for this year's Outstanding Paper Award for Journal of Organizational Ethnography
"Ethnography in evolution: adapting to the animal 'other' in organizations"
Lindsay Hamilton
University of Keele, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK
Nik Taylor
Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
Purpose – Traditionally, ethnography has been well placed to take account of the messy and complex processes that produce workplace cultures. Likewise, it has always taken interest in the objects, materials and symbolic artifacts that help furnish those
organizational cultures. Yet researchers face a particular challenge when the organization in question includes animals. The
purpose of this paper is to ask: How do we take account of such others? Are they objects, things, agents or should they be
considered to be workers?
Design/methodology/approach – The authors consider several examples of animal-human workplaces, including abattoirs, laboratories and farms, to argue that ethnography can, and should, take account of animals in creative new ways. First-hand experience of such settings is
drawn upon to argue that contemporary post-human scholarship and the creative arts offer the potential for more subtle research methods.
Findings – The authors’ fieldwork shows that it is not always a straightforward desire to care for other species that motivates people
to work with animals. Instead, a range of unexpected meanings can be drawn from the interaction with animals. It is also unsatisfactory
to claim that those working with animals are always motivated by the promise of paid employment. In many cases, notably the rescue shelter, work is often done on a voluntary basis. So the rewards are not always financial but reach into more symbolic
and ethical domains of value creation. Conversely, in slaughterhouses, the mechanization of the shopfloor makes it difficult for workers to relate to the “products” as animals at all. The repetitive nature of this work disconnects those on the production
line from the idea that they are dealing with bodies. The complexity of these human-animal relationships means that field
methods for studying them must be adapted and evolved.
Originality/value – This paper provokes some new questions about human-animal meaning making for organizational ethnographers. It does so to generate creative new ideas about field methods and the nature of the “others” that researchers participate with to observe.
Keywords Adapting ethnography, Animal interaction in organizations, Animals, Animals in organizations, Ethics, Evolving ethnography, Individual behaviour, Organizational culture, Organizational ethnography
www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/20466741211220642
This article originally appeared in Volume 1 Number 1, 2012, Journal of Organizational Ethnography
The following articles were selected for this year's Highly Commended Award
“Making organisational ethnography”
Tony J. Watson
This article originally appeared in Volume 1 Number 1, 2012, Journal of Organizational Ethnography
“Organizational ethnography between toolbox and world-making”
Dvora Yanow
This article originally appeared in Volume 1 Number 1, 2012, Journal of Organizational Ethnography
“Being there, teleography and the wire”
Martin Parker
This article originally appeared in Volume 1 Number 1, 2012, Journal of Organizational Ethnography
Outstanding Reviewer
Trudy Rudge