Alliance termination research: a bibliometric review and research agenda

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to examine the existing literature and evaluate the theories, characteristics, context and methods of alliance termination research published from 1992 to 2019. This study also aims to identify the gaps in the literature and recognize directions for future research focusing on alliance termination research.

Design/methodology/approach

The main research methods followed in this study are bibliometric review, citation analysis, co-citation analysis and cluster analysis.

Findings

The main findings of this study are the most cited articles, most productive journals and most productive countries. The results show that a total of 100 research articles were published between 1992 and 2019. The maximum number of publications were observed during 2011–2019. The article “Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures” (Inkpen and Beamish, 1997) was the most cited article and the “Academy of Management Review” was the most prominent journal, with 847 citations. The USA, France, the UK, Singapore and Canada are the most productive countries. The study also includes the analysis of the network of co-citation of references and co-occurrence of keywords in the context of alliance termination research.

Originality/value

To the best of authors’ knowledge, this study seems to be the first to perform bibliometric review and analysis in the area of alliance termination research. Therefore, it can help academicians and practitioners to identify the research trends and gaps in the alliance termination literature on which future research can be performed. Overall, this research paper leads to a better understanding of the alliance termination research and offers new insights into strategic management studies.

Citation

Rajan, R., Dhir, S. and Sushil (2020), "Alliance termination research: a bibliometric review and research agenda", Journal of Strategy and Management, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 351-375. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-10-2019-0184