To read this content please select one of the options below:

On the evaluation of public goods: cognitive and emotional aspects

Nicolao Bonini (Professor of Cognitive Psychology, Department of Economics and Management, University of Trento, Trento, Italy)
Ilana Ritov (Professor of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel)
Michele Graffeo (Research Fellow, Department of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy)

On the Horizon

ISSN: 1074-8121

Article publication date: 11 May 2015

490

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to provide a theoretical framework for the assessment of subjective value of public goods. Public goods are not traded, so they do not have market prices, even if they may be of great importance for the well-being of citizens (e.g. green spaces, urban air). A procedure used to estimate the economic value of a public good is the contingent evaluation method: people are asked to state how much they are willing to pay to preserve or restore a public good. Many studies report that the subjective evaluation of public goods is affected by factors that, according to standard economics, should be irrelevant, such as the manipulation of frame and prime. On the other hand, factors that should be relevant, such as the magnitude of the expected benefit, are neglected. It appears that the evaluation of a public good cannot be reduced to a mere cost–benefit tradeoff evaluation. On the contrary, it seems that the subjective value of a public good is constructed. The authors argue that to accurately predict and describe how people valuate public goods, it is fundamental to study how people construct the associated mental representation.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper takes into account the cognitive and emotional aspects of the evaluation of public goods.

Findings

Subjective valuation of public goods is affected by irrelevant factors and is not affected by relevant factors.

Practical implications

This paper provides an accurate description and prediction of how people evaluate public goods.

Social implications

The social implications of this paper include a better evaluation of public policies.

Originality/value

This paper is an original psychological perspective on the evaluation of public goods.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This paper describes the background knowledge used for the course on the psychology of decisions given by one of the authors at the Master in Social Foresight of the University of Trento.

Citation

Bonini, N., Ritov, I. and Graffeo, M. (2015), "On the evaluation of public goods: cognitive and emotional aspects", On the Horizon, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-02-2015-0009

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles