Plural policing: a State-of-the-Art Review

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to report on the systematic review on the topic of plural policing. The authors aim to discuss the general characteristics of empirical research into plural policing and describe the way in which police literature deals with the questions related to plural policing.

Design/methodology/approach

A systematic review, including qualitative research, focused on empirical research results.

Findings

First of all, plural policing has been subject of study in a diversity of contexts, using multiple methods and treating very diverse research questions. Although the dangers of blurring boundaries between policing actors is a focal issue in contemplative papers, empirical research on plural policing does not focus on this issue but mentions it in the margins of the research results.

Research limitations/implications

Limitations are that the authors had to set a timeframe for the systematic review and that not all research was accessible. Furthermore, the authors had to limit the studies that could be included in this systematic review.

Social implications

One of the main research questions relates to the dangers of blurring boundaries between multiple policing actors. This has important implications for citizens in their relations and contacts with police actors (in terms of transparency, equality of rights and so on).

Originality/value

The paper gives a first insight into a domain that is written on extensively, but less empirically studied and sheds light on the studies that have taken the topic of plural policing as the focal point.

Citation

Boels, D. and Verhage, A. (2016), "Plural policing: a State-of-the-Art Review", Policing: An International Journal, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-05-2015-0069