To read this content please select one of the options below:

Corporate social responsibility, organizational trust and commitment: a moderated mediation model

Nimmy A. George (Department of Commerce, Bharata Mata College, Thrikkakara, Kochi, India)
Nimitha Aboobaker (DDU Kaushal Kendra, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, India)
Manoj Edward (School of Management Studies, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, India)

Personnel Review

ISSN: 0048-3486

Article publication date: 25 August 2020

Issue publication date: 22 June 2021

1820

Abstract

Purpose

Drawing from the deontic justice theory and the social exchange theory, the purpose of this study attempts to identify the relationship between perceived corporate social responsibility (CSR) and employees' affective commitment, mediated through organizational trust. Furthermore, the authors seek to understand how the attitude of employees toward the importance of CSR, moderates the aforementioned relationship.

Design/methodology/approach

The respondents for this descriptive study were drawn from a sample of 500 employees working in manufacturing companies in India. Self-reporting questionnaires were administered among the respondents, who were selected through the judgment sampling method. Measurement model analysis was done using IBM AMOS 21.0 and path analytic procedures using PROCESS 3.0 macro was used to test the proposed hypotheses.

Findings

Results revealed that there is a significant indirect effect of all three dimensions of CSR on affective commitment, through organizational trust. The conditional indirect effects varied significantly, and it was identified that both employee-CSR and customer-CSR had a significant indirect effect on employee affective commitment. However, social/nonsocial CSR did not have a conditional indirect effect on affective commitment, through attitude toward the importance of CSR and organizational trust.

Research limitations/implications

The cross-sectional nature of the study does not allow inference of causality and pose limitations for generalization of results. Though the limitation of common method bias is inherent in studies with self-reporting measures, the authors adopted several procedural remedies to minimize its effect. The study results, particularly the role of attitude toward the importance of CSR need to be tested among employees in different industry sectors. Future studies should examine the same theoretical model in different nations, where CSR activities are not mandated by law.

Originality/value

This study is pioneering in conceptualizing and empirically testing a theoretical model that examined the combined influence of perceived CSR, employees' attitude toward the importance of CSR and organizational trust on their affective commitment toward the organization. This study extends the literature by examining the indirect/mechanisms linking CSR and employees' affective commitment. Exploring more on the employee individual differences and its influence on organizational outcomes will definitely improve individual and organizational functioning.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Funding: This research was supported by Teacher Fellowship under Faculty Development Programme of University Grants Commission; F. No. FIP/2017-18/SWRO-UGC/KLMG039 dated 29/05/2017; TF CODE: KLMG039/SWRO/006.

Citation

George, N.A., Aboobaker, N. and Edward, M. (2020), "Corporate social responsibility, organizational trust and commitment: a moderated mediation model", Personnel Review, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 1093-1111. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2020-0144

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles