Voluntary Standards and Ceremonial Adoption: Strategic Registration, Competition, and Audience in LEED Certification

Abstract

We study ceremonial adoption of voluntary standards, where participants adopt the standard in principle but do not change their practices. Ceremonial adoption can benefit individual participants, who may be able to reap the benefits of association with the standard at lower cost, but it can be problematic for overall levels of adoption. We conceive of ceremonial adoption as an interaction between strategic incentives of participants and social ties to their audiences, such that not all participants are likely to ceremonially adopt. Our setting is the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification for sustainable construction. We study the conditions under which projects register for LEED certification, allowing them to claim affiliation with LEED, but then do not actually finish certification. While our data are correlational in nature, our results suggest that studying the competition for audience members (in our case, occupants) can provide greater understanding of certification behavior as well as overall levels of adoption. Our findings have implications for organizations that design and maintain voluntary standards and for organization theorists who wish to understand field-level change. Thus, we provide more evidence that strategy and organizational theory interact in important and often unexamined ways.

Citation

Bowers, A. and Lee, H.J. (2023), "Voluntary Standards and Ceremonial Adoption: Strategic Registration, Competition, and Audience in LEED Certification", Di Stefano, G. and Wezel, F.C. (Ed.) Organization Theory Meets Strategy (Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 43), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 189-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220230000043008