To read this content please select one of the options below:

Sex differences in cooperation and prosocial behavior

Altruism and Prosocial Behavior in Groups

ISBN: 978-1-84855-572-3, eISBN: 978-1-84855-573-0

Publication date: 23 September 2009

Abstract

A long line of research has addressed whether there are sex differences in cooperation and other forms of prosocial behavior. Studies of social dilemmas (situations that pose a conflict between individual and collective interests) have yielded particularly contradictory conclusions about whether males or females are more cooperative. We present an evolutionary framework that synthesizes previous results and generates new insights into the sex and cooperation question. The framework addresses two general bases of sex differences in cooperation. First, we show how variation in the motivational structure of social dilemmas generates sex differences in cooperation. We then address two aspects of social structure, that, according to evolutionary reasoning, generate sex differences in cooperation: the sex composition of the group, and the interpersonal versus intergroup nature of the dilemma. After presenting new hypotheses and reviewing existing research relevant to each hypothesis, we conclude by making suggestions for future research.

Citation

Simpson, B. and Van Vugt, M. (2009), "Sex differences in cooperation and prosocial behavior", Thye, S.R. and Lawler, E.J. (Ed.) Altruism and Prosocial Behavior in Groups (Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 26), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0882-6145(2009)0000026007

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited