To read this content please select one of the options below:

Exploring the Trend of COVID-19 Treatment Efficiency in Chinese Provinces in 2020 by Using DEA and Regression Analysis

Advances in Business and Management Forecasting

ISBN: 978-1-83982-091-5, eISBN: 978-1-83982-090-8

Publication date: 1 September 2021

Abstract

In China, more than 80,000 people have been diagnosed with COVID-19, and more than 3,000 people have lost their lives. It seems that there will be more deaths since the epidemic is not over. All the Chinese provinces have reported the COVID-19 cases. This chapter aims to explore the trend of COVID-19 treatment efficiency in Chinese provinces using the data released daily by China Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Since China Center for Disease Control and Prevention began to release data daily from January 24 to March 12, we have more than 40 groups of daily data for 31 provinces in China mainland. In the calculation, we take the daily data of each province as a sample and then we have more than 1,200 samples in this study.

We use additive two-stage data envelopment analysis as an efficiency evaluation tool to calculate the COVID-19 treatment efficiency. In our framework, the first stage is to understand the infection rate and the second stage is to evaluate the treatment efficiency. In the first stage for the tth day, we use total population (p) and number of people infected in the previous day (inf t−1) as the inputs and cumulative number of people infected in the current day (inf t ) as the output. In the second stage for the tth day, we use cumulative number of people infected in the current day (inf t ) as the input and cumulative death in the current day (death t ) and cumulative recovery in the current day (recov t ) as the outputs. Some techniques on how to deal with undesirable outputs such as inf t and death t are employed in this study.

After we have the infection rate and treatment efficiency for the samples more than 1,200, we analyze the COVID-19 treatment efficiency and its development trend from January 24 to March 12 in 34 regions of China from static and dynamic aspects. The results show that, on the whole, the overall efficiency and phased efficiency of COVID-19 treatment efficiency in all regions of China are relatively high, which reflects the key factor for the Chinese government to quickly control the epidemic in the short term. Relatively speaking, the average efficiency value in the infection stage (first stage) is lower than the average efficiency value in the healing stage (second stage), which shows that the focus of anti-epidemic in China should be early detection and prevention rather than treatment process. In terms of trend, the total efficiency of COVID-19 treatment in each region shows a trend of “increasing first and then decreasing.” Our analysis indicates that in the initial stage, the continuous increase of various resources leads to the rise of the total efficiency, while in the later stage, the rapid decline of the number of infected people leads to the decrease of the total efficiency. Based on the results of the efficiency analysis, this study provides corresponding management implications and policy suggestions, hoping to provide some enlightenment and suggestions for the anti-epidemic work of other countries in the severe environment where the epidemic is spreading rapidly.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71631006, 71991464/271991460), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2019M662210), Xin Wenke Program of University of Science and Technology of China (No. XWK2019029), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Citation

Yang, F., Bi, Z., Wei, F. and Huang, Z. (2021), "Exploring the Trend of COVID-19 Treatment Efficiency in Chinese Provinces in 2020 by Using DEA and Regression Analysis", Lawrence, K.D. and Klimberg, R.K. (Ed.) Advances in Business and Management Forecasting (Advances in Business and Management Forecasting, Vol. 14), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 119-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1477-407020210000014009

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021 by Emerald Publishing Limited