Beating Swords into Plowshares to Realize the Potential of the UNGC: Using Appeasement to Constrain the Arms Industry

Abstract

United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan’s creation of the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) in 1999 inspired great hopes. As we explain, however, the noble initiatives of the UNGC are undermined by the arms industry. Arms are expensive. The expenditure on arms diverts a nation’s “resources from ‘productive’ to ‘unproductive’ ends.” The arms industry is a major employer in most arms manufacturing nations. It generates much needed revenue for those countries. Therefore, attempts at thwarting the supply of arms are doomed to failure. Instead of halting the supply of arms, we argue as to the advantages of restraining the demand for arms. Michael Walzer is the only moral philosopher who has considered the ethics of appeasement. We explore Walzer’s arguments for appeasement and consider how a United Nations Secretary-General could appease those nations demanding arms. In doing so, the UN Secretary-General would make it possible for the UNGC to achieve what was initially envisaged for the UNGC.

Citation

Schwartz, M. and Comer, D.R. (2016), "Beating Swords into Plowshares to Realize the Potential of the UNGC: Using Appeasement to Constrain the Arms Industry", The Contribution of Love, and Hate, to Organizational Ethics (Research in Ethical Issues in Organizations, Vol. 16), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 161-180. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-209620160000016006