Capital projects: wishful thinking and worse!

The Bottom Line

ISSN: 0888-045X

Article publication date: 1 June 1999

89

Keywords

Citation

(1999), "Capital projects: wishful thinking and worse!", The Bottom Line, Vol. 12 No. 2. https://doi.org/10.1108/bl.1999.17012baf.010

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 1999, MCB UP Limited


Capital projects: wishful thinking and worse!

The following Anbar abstracts are a review of the most pertinent recently published literature. They are selected for The Bottom Line from Anbar Management Intelligence, available by subscription from Anbar Electronic Intelligence.

Licenced copies of these articles are available at a cost of £6.00 (plus VAT in EU countries where applicable), US$11.00 per credit from Anbar Electronic Intelligence, 60/62 Toller Lane, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD8 9BY, UK. Prepayment for this service is required and, when ordering, please submit a cheque made payable to Anbar Electronic Intelligence. When ordering please quote the reference number and the credit level given at the foot of each abstract.

Capital projects: wishful thinking and worse!

P. Prendergast in Management Accounting (UK), Nov. 1998 Vol. 76 No. 10: p. 41 (2 pages)

Cites some disastrously wrong forecasts for large capital projects and argues that behavioural aspects play an important part in gaining approval for bad or unrealistic projects. Criticizes the bureaucratic "layers of approval" process used in most large businesses and refers to research findings to show the huge proportion of projects which are over budget and/or late in both the public and private sectors. Reports an Irish survey of large organization unit managers to explore reasons for the overforecasting of revenues/underforecasting of costs, quoting respondents to illustrate the factors encouraging manipulation of the figures and the information deficit between accountants and operating managers. Suggests that non-executive directors or independent consultants could be used to inject more realism and objectivity into key stages of the project approval process.

Subject(s): Capital budgeting, Forecasting, Individual behaviour

Style: Survey, Comparative/evaluation

Reference: 28AA396 (1 credit)

Related articles