Beyond top-down and bottom-up work redesign: customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals

Citation

(2010), "Beyond top-down and bottom-up work redesign: customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals", Development and Learning in Organizations, Vol. 24 No. 6. https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo.2010.08124fad.001

Beyond top-down and bottom-up work redesign: customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals

Article Type: Abstracts From: Development and Learning in Organizations, Volume 24, Issue 6

Hornung S., , Rosseau D.M., , Glaser J., , Angerer P. and , Weigl M.Journal of Organizational Behaviour, March 2010, Volume 31 Issue 2, Start page: 187, No. of pages: 29

Two established approaches to work redesign are formal top-down interventions and proactive bottom-up job crafting. Top-down approaches are limited in their ability to create individually optimized work characteristics, whereas bottom-up processes are constrained by the latitude workers have to modify their own jobs. Following recent research on the idiosyncratic deals (i-deals) individuals negotiate with their employer, task i-deals customizing job content are suggested as a third approach to work redesign. Hypotheses on antecedents and consequences of task i-deals were tested in two studies conducted in the United States and Germany using structural equation modeling. LMX related positively to the extent of successfully negotiated task i-deals, which, in turn, was associated with a more positive evaluation of work characteristics – specifically, higher complexity and control and lower stressors. Work characteristics mediated positive indirect effects of task i-deals on employee initiative and work engagement. Denied requests for task i-deals were associated with a more negative assessment of work characteristics. We conclude with theoretical, practical, and research implications for better understanding and implementing work redesign through i-deals. Article type: Research paper ISSN: 0894-3796 Reference: 39AP160

Keywords: Autonomy, Career development, Germany, Job design, United States of America