To read this content please select one of the options below:

The Evaluation of Teaching Performance

T.J. MOORE (Assistant Director of Secondary Education in the Victorian Education Department. He holds the degrees of B.A. and B.Ed. of the University of Melbourne and M.Ed. of the University of Alberta)
W.D. NEAL (Deputy Director General of Education in Western Australia, is now Associate Dean for Planning and Development in the Faculty of Education at the University of Alberta. He is a graduate of the University of Western Australia and Teachers College, Columbia University)

Journal of Educational Administration

ISSN: 0957-8234

Article publication date: 1 February 1969

289

Abstract

Evaluation of teaching Is a key concern of educational administration. In Victoria, Australia, inspectors are required to carry out assessments of teaching performance hut no written guide or checklist is provided. This study seeks to identify by means of two instruments, a critical incident paper and an evaluation record designed to highlight Mitzel's Product, Process and Presage criteria, the criteria used by Victorian inspectors in evaluating teacher performance. It was found that inspectors stressed Process criteria when recommending promotion in teaching positions and Presage criteria when recommending selection for administrative positions. Little emphasis was placed on Product criteria. Inspectors' judgments of teachers were found to be based largely on their own individual “image” of good teachers. On the basis of this study it seems that a guide could be developed to assist inspectors in reaching agreement on basic criteria for promotion of teachers.

Citation

MOORE, T.J. and NEAL, W.D. (1969), "The Evaluation of Teaching Performance", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb009637

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1969, MCB UP Limited

Related articles