To read this content please select one of the options below:

ORGANISATIONAL ROLE CLIMATES: SUCCESS‐FAILURE CONFIGURATIONS IN EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP: (or Are Educational Administrators Doomed to Succeed?)

DAN E. INBAR (Head of the Division of Educational Planning and Administration, School of Education, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. He holds the degrees of B.A. and M.A. of the same university and Ph.D. of the University of California at Berkeley.)

Journal of Educational Administration

ISSN: 0957-8234

Article publication date: 1 February 1980

101

Abstract

The classical dichotomy between success and failure is hardly applicable in the analysis of organisational behaviour, performance and outcomes in complex social roles, such as those in education. A unique approach has to be developed. Hence, a threefold classification has been pursued here: unequivocal failure, “satisficing”, and unequivocal success. Although viewed as existing along a continuum, they are marked out by failure and success thresholds. Four basic role climates, transpiring from four basic failure‐success configurations, have been identified and analysed: “apathetic”, “frustrating”, “tense”, and “tranquil” role climates, from which preliminary hypotheses of organisational behaviour have been derived. Application of the analytical framework developed here was restricted to the school principal, a complex role, with many components which are characterised by different and often conflicting role climates. Tentative propositions relating to school principal role climates and organisational behaviour were postulated on the basis of this analytical framework.

Citation

INBAR, D.E. (1980), "ORGANISATIONAL ROLE CLIMATES: SUCCESS‐FAILURE CONFIGURATIONS IN EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP: (or Are Educational Administrators Doomed to Succeed?)", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 232-244. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb009829

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1980, MCB UP Limited

Related articles